Dear @anoma

Why is Anoma's "intention-centric" design better than traditional blockchain trading methods?

Every time you trade, you are performing a "command" operation, telling the system: "I want to transfer X to Y" or "I want to swap A and B."
Many times, we do not fully understand the underlying processes and simply execute some operations. So, Anoma comes out and says, "No, no, no, your approach is too complicated! Let's use an 'intention-centric' method, where users just need to express their intentions, and the rest is left to the system to resolve!"
What the hell is the Intent Center?
In simple terms, the design of the intent center is to allow users to express what they want, rather than directly providing specific steps to operate.
In traditional blockchains, transactions are the most fundamental unit. When you initiate a transaction, it executes automatically. It's like you directly tell the system: "I transfer X from A to B." But the problem is that this kind of operation is somewhat like a rigid command, lacking flexibility. In the world of Anoma, intention is the most central element. You express your needs, and the rest is collaboratively fulfilled by the system and the intentions of other users. This approach is more flexible and intelligent.
For developers, Anoma's "Intent Center" design is a significant benefit. In the Anoma system, through the combination of intents and validity predicates, developers can focus more on the core logic of their applications without having to worry about every little detail as before; the system will help you verify the correctness of the operations.

@KaitoAI